How a European Carbon Central Bank can turn Europe into a CO2 “eater” – PIK

The starting point for the considerations presented in this year’s lecture is the need to “overshoot”: due to the delay in climate policy, humanity must temporarily accept more greenhouse gas in the atmosphere than consistent with the temperature targets. At the same time, carbon removals must be increased on an industrial scale, including through new methods such as air filter systems or climate plantations – the cultivation of fast-growing biomass for combustion with carbon capture and storage. After the climate transition, the removals will compensate both for the unavoidable (or very difficult to avoid) residual emissions and for the excess CO₂ content. This enormous future task – in some scenarios, carbon removals will cost 3 percent of global economic output by mid-century – must be organised efficiently.

Edenhofer proposes so-called clean-up certificates as a core instrument. They give the right to emit one tonne of CO₂ in combination with the obligation to take back one tonne of CO₂ at a specific future date. So far, the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) only offers simple emission rights, which are reduced year by year and, according to current legislation, will fall to zero in 2039. Adding clean-up certificates makes the climate transition cheaper and more flexible: CO₂ emissions would not have to be avoided at all costs, even as permits become scarcer, if it is more cost-effective to emit now and remove later. The price of these certificates would reflect expected future cost reductions in carbon removal technologies. The financial risk of the climate transition would then be borne not by the state, but by the economy, which is, after all, obliged to make the removals.

Carbon removal can become a game changer

To ensure that the idea does not fail due to physical inadequacies or corporate tricks, Edenhofer argues that it should be implemented by a strong and credible institution, and makes the case for a future “European Carbon Central Bank”. By issuing the certificates, it could oversee the quantity control of net emissions, keeping this matter out of day-to-day party politics – just as the European Central Bank does with interest rates. This important new EU authority could also correctly reflect the economic value of non-permanent removals, such as afforestation or storing CO₂ in building materials, in the clean-up certificates. And to ensure that companies do not undermine their carbon removal obligation through strategic bankruptcy, they would have to deposit financial collateral with the Carbon Central Bank.

“Even today, carbon removal is far from a niche technology – and it is becoming the third missing pillar in global climate policy alongside emissions avoidance and climate adaptation,” Edenhofer argued in his Thünen Lecture. “The Director of MCC and of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research also heads the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change, which was founded by the EU in 2022. “Edenhofer concluded that “technological progress in this area can significantly reduce the costs” and that a greater focus on carbon removal “can enhance international cooperation around climate protection”. “Carbon removal can become a game changer,” he added, “and I have tried to map out some next steps.”

Since 1986, the Thünen Lecture has been one of the highlights of the annual conference of the German Economic Association (Verein für Socialpolitik), which ranks among the largest and most respected economic conferences in Europe. According to the association, the invitation to give this lecture “honours distinguished members or other persons and their academic achievements in Economics in the German-speaking world”.