Wed. Dec 11th, 2024
electric mobility, electric car, charging station
An empty parking place for e-cars. Photo by distelAPPArath on Pixabay

Brussels, 20 August 2024 

Today, as part of its ongoing anti-subsidy investigation, the European Commission has disclosed to interested parties the draft decision to impose definitive countervailing duties on imports of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) from China. This draft decision reflects the comments received from interested parties on the provisional countervailing duties published on 4 July 2024, as well as the conclusion of a number of investigative steps that had not been finalised at provisional stage.

The disclosure of draft definitive findings is an intermediate procedural step in a trade defence investigation. The aim is to give interested parties the opportunity to comment, as was also done at provisional stage. Once the Commission has analysed all comments by interested parties, and Member States have given their opinion, the final decision will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

The main novelties in the disclosure of the draft definitive findings – which are stillsubject to changebased on substantiated comments by interested parties – are as follows:

  • A slightadjustment of the proposed duty ratesbased on substantiated comments on the provisional measures received from interested parties, as well as the conclusion of investigative steps that had not yet been finalised at provisional stage:
    • BYD: 17,0%
    • Geely: 19,3%
    • SAIC: 36,3%
    • Other cooperating companies: 21,3%
    • All other non-cooperating companies: 36,3%;
  • The decision togrant an individual duty rateto Tesla as an exporter from China, established at 9%, at this stage;
  • The possibility for several Chinese exporters and certainjoint ventureswith EU producers – which did not yet export at the time of the investigation period – to benefit from the lower duty rate foreseen for their related cooperating companies; and
  • The decisionnot to retroactively collect countervailing duties.
Procedure and next steps

On 4 October 2023, the Commission formallyinitiatedanex-officioanti-subsidy investigation on imports of BEVs for passengers originating in China.

On 4 July 2024 the Commissionpublishedin theOfficial Journal of the European Unionthe regulation imposing provisional countervailing duties on imports of BEVs from China. The duties entered into force on 5 July 2024.

On 20 August 2024 the Commission disclosed to interested parties the draft decision to impose definitive countervailing duties on imports of BEVs from China. This decision was made after the Commission considered all the comments received from interested parties on the regulation imposing provisional measures.

Interested parties also have the possibility to request hearings with the Commission services as soon as possible, and to provide comments within 10 days.

After that, having taken into account the comments by interested parties, the Commission will present the final determination to Member States, which will vote pursuant to the examination procedure under comitology rules (Commission proposal adopted unless there is qualified majority against it). This vote will have binding effect.

Definitive measures must be imposed no later than 4 months after imposition of provisional duties. A Commission Implementing Regulation including the definitive findings in the investigation will be published in the Official Journal by 30 October 2024, at the latest (within maximum 13 months of initiation).

Any potential measures will be in force for 5 years, extendable upon substantiated request and subsequent review.

Background

The investigation was announced by Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, on 13 September 2023 during her State of the European Union (SOTEU) speech. This decision was based on growing evidence-based concerns about the recent and rapid rise in low-priced exports of electric vehicles coming from China to the EU. The Commission is following strict legal procedures in line with EU and WTO rules, allowing all parties concerned, including the Chinese government and companies/exporters, to present their comments, evidence and arguments.

For More Information

More information is available on the Commission’sTrade website, in the public register under case numberAS689.

EU Trade Defence Policy

Questions and answers

 


Questions and Answers on the disclosure to interested parties of draft definitive findings of anti-subsidy investigation into imports of battery electric vehicles from China

Brussels, 20 August 2024

Why have the proposed duty rates changed?

The small upward or downward adjustments to the duty rates of the sampled companies reflect technical corrections based on substantiated comments received from the interested parties on the provisional measures.

These revisions show that the Commission fully respects all relevant rules and obligations, and bases its findings strictly on facts and evidence.

It similarly proves that the greatest care is taken to ensure that the investigation is both robust and correct.

Moreover, it proves that the EU is fully transparent and does not fear submitting the accuracy of its calculations to detailed inspection by the companies concerned and does not hesitate to adjust its findings when warranted.

The revision of the rate applicable to “cooperating, non-sampled companies” resulted from a technical correction in the average calculation.

Would the duties be added on top of the current import duties of 10%?

Yes, countervailing duties would be added on top of the ordinary import duty of 10% levied on imports of battery electric vehicles.

Why did Tesla receive an individual duty rate?

As announced at the provisional measures stage, Tesla submitted a substantiated request for an “individual examination” to determine its duty level based on the specific subsidies it received.

This request has been under thorough examination and the assessment of the level of subsidies received is reflected in the duty levels at the definitive stage.

The Commission verified the information during the verification visit in China and conducted the same checks as of the other sampled Chinese exporting producers.

Any differences in duty levels reflect the varying levels of subsidization among the different schemes, which were affected by various elements, such as the level of cooperation and the different organizational structures in areas like financing.

Why did the Commission decide against the retroactive collection of the duties?

On 6 March 2024 the Commission started the registration of imports of battery electric vehicles from China in view of the potential retroactive collection of duties. The findings of the investigation, as outlined in the draft definitive measures disclosed today, indicate that the legal requirements for the retroactive collection of duties are not fulfilled. Accordingly, there will be no retroactive collection of provisional countervailing duties or retroactive collection of duties for the registered imports for the 3 months period before the imposition of provisional duties.

Therefore, the amounts secured by way of the provisional countervailing duty, should be released and not collected. A final decision on this matter will only be adopted upon the publication of the definitive regulation by 30 October 2024, at the latest.

Why have certain joint ventures with EU producers – which originally did not import during the investigation period – been granted ‘new exporter’ status and will thus benefit from the lower duty rate for non-sampled cooperating companies?

Several Chinese exporting producers, including certain joint ventures with EU producers, which did not initially export during the investigation period and would be subject to the higher residual duty rate, requested to be included in the list of cooperating producers in order to benefit from the lower duty rate foreseen for their related companies.

The Commission further investigated this issue. Among the parameters analysed, elements such as being related to a cooperating producer, having production of BEVs -or having substantiated evidence of plans and investments for the production of BEVs – during the investigation period, and imminent exports to the Union, were considered.

The draft definitive findings therefore conclude that, with the exception of an unjustified request, these companies should benefit from the duty established for the cooperating group in which they are integrated. The decisions taken on this subject are in line with our legal framework and WTO-compatible.

What are the next steps?

On 20 August 2024 the Commission disclosed to interested parties, including Chinese companies and Member States, its definitive findings in the anti-subsidy investigation. The Government of China was also notified and received full disclosure.

This final disclosure takes into account comments by interested parties and hearings held with them following the imposition of provisional measures in July 2024, as well as the conclusion of a number of investigative steps that had not been finalised at provisional stage.

Interested parties now have 10 days – until 30 August 2024 – to provide comments and request hearings on the final disclosure.

Once the Commission has assessed the comments received by interested parties, the draft regulation will be submitted to the Trade Defence Instruments Committee (‘TDC’), composed by representatives of the Member States.

The opinion of Member States will be delivered under the examination procedure, according to Comitology Rules (Commission proposal adopted unless there is qualified majority against it). This vote will have binding effect.

A Commission Implementing Regulation including the definitive findings in the investigation will be published in the Official Journal by 30 October 2024, at the latest.

Any potential measures will be in force for 5 years, extendable upon substantiated request and subsequent review.

When will Member States vote on the duties?

The TDC holds regular meetings – the Commission cannot confirm at which meeting the draft regulation will be discussed.

Does the WTO consultation request on the provisional measures submitted by China have an impact on the anti-subsidy investigation?

The two proceedings follow separate tracks. There is no impact on the timeline of the ongoing investigation, the investigation follows its course.

The EU is carefully studying all the details of China’s WTO consultation request and will react to the Chinese authorities in due course, according to WTO procedures.

The Commission is confident of the WTO-compatibility of its investigation and provisional measures.

Source – EU Commission

 

Forward to your friends